CoinCompassCanadian money
Home / News / Economy · Lire en français
Canada and U.S. negotiators race to sketch a deal before 50% tariffs hit on Aug. 19 — Economy · CoinCompass
Economy

Canada and U.S. negotiators race to sketch a deal before 50% tariffs hit on Aug. 19

Dominic LeBlanc and Jamieson Greer met for the second time in under a week, aiming to put a deal outline before President Trump ahead of new 50% levies on Canadian goods.

Canadian and American trade officials are trying to put the outline of a trade agreement in front of U.S. President Donald Trump days before a new round of 50 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods is scheduled to take effect on Aug. 19, according to Canadian Press reporting carried by BNN Bloomberg on Tuesday.

Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, accompanied by chief trade negotiator Janice Charette, met U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer for the second time in under a week. LeBlanc said the discussions were ongoing and that Canada would "firmly advance and defend Canadian interests." Asked whether a deal could be reached before the deadline, he said he hoped so.

What is on the table

The new levies stem from three proclamations Mr. Trump signed on July 20 under Section 338 of the U.S. Tariff Act of 1930. They impose a 50 per cent tariff on a range of Canadian products, from cement and wine to hockey sticks.

Washington says the measures respond to provincial bans on American alcohol, Canada's supply-managed dairy system and Canadian tariffs and quotas on some U.S.-made vehicles. Proposals reportedly under discussion include removing Canada's counter-tariffs on autos, lifting provincial alcohol bans and changing how dairy quotas are administered.

  • The Canadian Press estimated the measures would hit about $28 billion in Canadian goods if no deal is reached; The Hub put the figure at roughly US$20 billion, or about 4.9 per cent of U.S. goods imports from Canada in 2024.
  • The duties would stack on top of existing tariffs and apply whether or not a product qualifies under CUSMA.
  • Energy, potash, critical minerals, fish and goods already covered by Section 232 tariffs are excluded.

Why the target is narrow but the stakes are not

Roughly 5 per cent of Canada's exports to the U.S. is a small slice of total trade, but the products involved are concentrated in specific industries and regions. A 50 per cent duty layered on top of existing tariffs is high enough to price many of these goods out of the American market, which would fall hardest on the plants and workers that make them.

The talks are also a test run for the broader relationship. Lumber and autos remain under separate U.S. tariffs, and any concession Ottawa makes now could shape the larger CUSMA negotiations ahead.

The sceptics' case

Not everyone expects a breakthrough. Former Canadian ambassador to the U.S. David MacNaughton said Canada has a "fairly substantial package" to offer but doubted Washington was ready for a comprehensive deal. He noted that Greer does not have the authority to close an agreement on his own, so any final deal would have to be settled between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Mr. Trump.

MacNaughton also warned against piecemeal concessions, arguing the U.S. could simply threaten more tariffs later. That is the core risk for Ottawa: giving ground on dairy or alcohol without getting durable relief in return.

What it means for Canadian households and investors

For most households, the immediate effect is indirect. If the tariffs land, the pressure shows up first in the affected industries through slower orders, weaker hiring and possible layoffs, and more broadly through business confidence and the loonie.

For investors, trade headlines can move Canadian stocks and the dollar quickly in both directions. A diversified portfolio that is not concentrated in a handful of export-exposed sectors is the usual way to ride out that kind of policy uncertainty. This is general information, not personal advice; the Aug. 19 deadline is the date to watch.

Related

More in Economy

Sources

General news and information, not individualized financial advice. Figures reflect the publication date.